CORRECT LANGUAGE ABOUT PREGNANCY AND ABORTION When
a woman is pregnant. people often say she is
‘expecting a child” or is going to have baby " or is "going to be a
mother”. We all use these expressions from force of habit. and
using them has no reflection on the strength of our pro-life convictions. Nevertheless, may I
suggest that we no longer use these phrases. They do
not accurately describe what is happening. A woman who is
pregnant is not expecting” a child She already has one
The child exists. is living and growing in her
womb She is not about to bring the child "into the world" The child
is already in the world. The mother’s womb is as much in the world as the mother
herself The pregnant woman
is not "going to be" a mother She already is a mother. By Saying She
is "going to be" a mother. We inadvertently reinforce the notion that
motherhood begins at birth. This reinforces the idea that the child really is a
child only at birth. A
pregnant woman is fully a mother She does not have half’ a child or a child on
the way (On the way , From where?) The child is here,
already in the world. Fully unique and in possession of the same
dignity as every other person. If our Language
reflects this reality, we will help the world to understand that children in
the womb are indeed members of the human family- right here and now. People will then be
able to ask the right question about abortion. The reasons many give in support of
abortion, arid the reasons many obtain abortions. focus
on the question ‘Should she have another child?” Issues such as partner
support. maternity and resources are discussed. When we say “no abortion" they hear us saying. ‘Have a
child no matter w hat" they conclude we are unrealistic or
insensitive to the real—life plight of the woman. But the question
here is NOT. ‘Should she have another child” Our answer to that question can
sometimes he ‘no” There can be circumstances - medical. financial.
and social - in which a person should not have another child. If, however, a woman
is pregnant, she already has a child. There is no longer a question about
whether this child will come into existence The only
honest question or choice left at this point is. ‘Will this child be cared for
or will this child be killed?” While we can sometimes say that circumstance
dictate not having another child, we can never say that circumstance dictate killing
a child. Unless people
distinguish the question of “having a child” from “killing a child you have’. they will not even begin honestly evaluating abortion. and will argue past each other. We are in fact very
sensitive to circumstances such as immaturity, or lack of resources to raise a
child Were the child born, however, would the problems of immaturity or lack of
resources disappear the day after birth? Yet on that day, just about
everyone can see that killing the child is not justified. What makes abortion
different? What is the difference between killing the child before or after
birth to solve the problems? It’s the same woman, the same problems. and the same child There is no difference in reality There
is only a different question. Priests for Life. Canada I
Prêtres Pro Vie Canada
Saint
Charbel for Life |