They Built a Death Chamber in a Catholic Hospital. You Paid for It
This article was published by Kelsi Sheren on her substack on June 17, 2025..
عربي
This Is Not Medicine. It’s
Modern Extermination. Inside the St. Paul’s Death Chamber in a Catholic Hospital.
By Kelsi Sheren
St. Paul’s hospital in BC has just installed a new killing centre. Now servicing BC patient’s the government has decided are to expensive to actually care for. A Recent decision by the British Columbia government to forcibly establish MAiD killing centres adjacent to the Catholic operated St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver represents where Canada is at when it comes to helping its citizens. This is a unprecedented shift in Canada’s healthcare practices, raising profound ethical, religious, and societal concerns.
These new locations popping up across the country are designed for effective and fast killing. A one stop shop for death.
You come in and you never come out. This is Canadian heath care…. so they say.
St. Paul’s Hospital
In June 2023, pro death cult advocates significantly escalated their pressure campaign, utilizing the tragic case of Samantha O’Neill as leverage. If you haven’t heard of this case, let me give you the coals notes. Samantha O’Neill had requested to be killed at St. Paul’s Hospital, but in alignment with its longstanding Catholic ethical stance against euthanasia, the hospital transferred her compassionately to St. John’s Hospice.
Instead of recognizing this action as a respectful accommodation of religious ethics and patient choice, the pro death cults of Canada leveraged intense media scrutiny to insist that Catholic hospitals should directly provide euthanasia, I.E DEATH. They framed transfers as inhumane and insensitive. Just a quick side bar, I think killing someone is more inhumane and insensitive then moving some one, but I digress.
Naturally the weak BC government gave into the pressure and public controversy. By December 1, 2023, it expropriated land from Providence Health, the Catholic entity overseeing St. Paul’s, and proceeded rapidly to construct a dedicated killing facility, now known as the “Shoreline Space.” This facility, described as utilitarian and starkly institutional, sits discreetly (INTENTIONALLY) within an interior courtyard of the existing St. Paul’s Hospital.
Hidden behind security fencing and gates, and shielded from public awareness. As do all bad things happen, hidden away from prying eyes and in the dark.
This structure symbolizes a horrific new reality: killing administered covertly yet deliberately close to faith based medical institutions dedicated to preserving life.
Even more alarming is the government’s intention to replicate this controversial approach. Detailed investigative reporting by independent journalist Terry O’Neill uncovered evidence that planning for yet another killing facility is already well underway at the new St. Paul’s Hospital, currently under construction at False Creek Flats. This new facility, expected to open by 2027, just in time for the new expansion of MAID in the mentally ill. This side example of health care will further embed killing in a setting historically committed to life affirming care.
Internal emails and documents obtained through freedom-of-information requests reveal extensive logistical planning to ensure seamless integration of killing services, including specific requirements regarding proximity to the pharmacy, emergency services access, and even parking logistics.
The graphic and chilling reality extends beyond St. Paul’s Hospital. O’Neill’s reporting has shown that Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) already operates MAiD facilities within buildings housing Catholic run hospices May’s Place and St. John Hospice despite Providence Health’s explicit, longstanding prohibition against killing. Providence Health, constrained by contracts and lease agreements, remains powerless to prevent these facilities from operating so intimately close to their hospice patients, creating a profound ethical conflict and confusion for staff, patients, and families alike.
Grafeneck castle
Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, highlights the chilling historical parallels to Germany’s notorious Aktion T4 euthanasia program. Specifically, he references Grafeneck Castle, initially a compassionate Lutheran care facility forcibly expropriated by the Nazi regime to become the first euthanasia killing center. The similarities in governmental overreach, forcible land expropriation, and ethical disregard raise uncomfortable and necessary historical comparisons.
Vancouver physician Dr. Will Johnston further underscores the severity of these actions, characterizing the imposition of euthanasia killing facilities into traditionally life affirming spaces as an expression of governmental totalitarianism. Johnston argues that such policies demonstrate not inclusion or respect for diversity, but a dangerous intolerance toward those with conscientious objections, effectively marginalizing religious and ethical convictions from healthcare delivery.
The pro death cult are jumping up and down, bragging at there events that they finally broke the only religious safe guard we had left. (This is true I have an audio recording I made while at one)
Louis Brier nursing home.
This is not the first either. “Dr” Ellen Wiebe has broken these rules before. She attempted to defending herself against allegations of “sneaking in and killing someone” at an orthodox Jewish nursing home. “
“The Louis Brier Nursing Home in Vancouver has issued a formal complaint with the B.C. College of Physicians and Surgeons against Dr. Ellen Wiebe after she granted 83-year-old Barry Hyman’s request to die at the facility he calls home.”
Long and short, she went in and MAIDED a man in a Jewish nursing home.
“Dr’s” like her don’t see why this is completely unacceptable.
As Canadians, we need to stop hiding behind what’s happening here and with this disturbing trajectory, we need to stand up. Why aren’t we urgently questioning our politicians and asking why all our tax dollars are going to perfecting and facilitating killing centres but not hospitals.
Why are we adding more locations to increase death and not health care?
Why are we not asking our community how they feel about people being brought into a hiding building, never to come out again?
Why are we standing by as Canada becomes the eugenics capital of the world.
Why are we allowing these pro death cult bullies to come after our only remaining religious strongholds??
Ill tell you why we aren’t, because the dark is scary.
It’s terrifying if I’m being honest, because these people and this government have made it clear that they don’t actually want to help people, they want to remove the “burdens” from our society. They want to cut out the vulnerable and those who can no longer protect themselves, those who’s families have given up on them due to overbearing medical costs or care giver burnout.
Canada showed it’s hand when it began prioritizing death over life by building facilities specifically for killing and cutting funding for those needed for healing.
And now we will begin eradicating anyone who even looks a little ill, because if your not lonely enough, desperate enough, poor enough, sick enough or mentally unwell yet.
Give it time, the way this country is going.
It’s only a matter of time.
LINKS:
https://alexschadenberg.blogspot.com/2025/06/euthanasia-maid-unit-forced-onto-st.html
https://alexschadenberg.blogspot.com/2025/05/vancouver-death-clinic-imposed-on.html
https://bccatholic.ca/news/catholic-van/government-taking-property-from-st-paul-s-hospital-to-deliver-maid
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-monday-edition-1.4477708/doctor-accused-of-sneaking-in-and-killing-someone-at-jewish-nursing-home-says-she-did-nothing-wrong-1.4477714
Euthanasia
Euthanasia, or relief the sick by a killing medicine, it is one the of fruit of the culture of death, in a society and cultural context which makes it more difficult to face and accept suffering, the temptation becomes all the greater to resolve the problem of suffering by eliminating it at the root, by hastening death so that it occurs at the moment considered most suitable. (Evangelium Vitae)
The victim is usually, though not exclusively, a chronically terminally ill patient, not necessarily Imminently dying. The person performing the act of euthanasia is often, but not exclusively, a health care professional. The participation of the medical profession in these acts has led to the use of the term-medicalized killing.
It is important to be clear as to which medically based decisions at the end of life should not be classified as euthanasia. Allowing a terminally ill person in the last stages of life to die a natural death is not euthanasia. Where the situation is medically hopeless, a decision not to provide or continue extraordinary or heroic measures where such no longer offer any hope for healing is ethical, legal and consistent with standard medical practice. It is also consistent with thousands of years of religious belief and practice.
-Euthanasia is sometimes classified according to the presence or absence of a request by the patient:
Voluntary Euthanasia
Is carried out at the request by the patient with his or her will without any pressure.
Non Voluntary Euthanasia
Occurs when the patient is incapable of understanding the choice between life and death.
Involuntary Euthanasia
Is the term used when the individual is capable of consenting to death but does not do so, either because he or she is not asked, or because he or she is asked and choose to go on living.
Mercy Killing
The word killing is for the evil one, and Mercy is for the loving one and for God. But mixing the two together to justify a killing act of human being mixes the interior feelings to make the evil look as a good deed. And the result is a killing of a spirit and an offense against life in its beginning (abortion) or in its stages or at its end (Mercy Killing).
A large number of doctors (in Netherlands) admitted and openly that they gave a lethal injection to some of the terminally ill patients and they lied in the death Certificate, as we know Doctor Kevorkian in the U.S. had killed over 150 persons in what is called physician assisted suicide.
The descendants and the relatives must be aware of this danger, which threaten them personally and threaten their parents and relatives, and never fall into the deadly trap by the psychological and financial pressure that the hospitals and Doctors puts on the families. To avoid financial burden on them and the health care system and here the patient gets into a hesitation between staying alive and a Voluntary Euthanasia decision, to avoid his or her family this pressure, which make the trust diminish between the patient and the family and the doctor.
Even if they ask to leave this life in unnatural way we should not let them or let the doctor to do so, if the medical treatment does not help any more. We let the natural way of death to take effect, and take care of them for the last moment and never declare them in a Vegetables state, and never get trapped under the phrase “brain dead”. Because some of the doctors may quick to declare this situation to get rid of the patient or to harvest and sell his organs to who ever deed it, as it is happening in the third world.
Assisted Suicide
Assisted suicide is term used when a mentally competent person has formed the desire to end his or her life, but requires help to perform the act, usually because of physical disability. When the help requested be given by doctor, the act is called physician assisted suicide. A common form of assistance might be providing a lethal dose of drug for the person to administer.
Historical Roots
In 1920, a book was published in Leipzig, Germany entitled “the release of the Destruction of life Devoid of life”. The authors, jurist Karl Binding and psychiatrist Alfred Hoche believed that were many lives in Germany that were not worthy living. Thus they set out proposals to justify the “destruction” of these lives. The intelligentsia of the day and spread throughout the German medical profession took up this justification.
The Nazis adopted this thinking, and by the end of the Nazi euthanasia program, the number of innocent human being killed included more than 300,000 mentally handicapped children and adults, and hundreds of thousands of elderly, all who were deemed worthless, Hitler further adapted the system of “ destruction” to rid Europe of the Jews, the Gypsies and anyone not considered “ useful”.
Dr. Leo Alexander, an Austrian born psychiatrist and an expert consultant to the Nuremburg War Crimes trial, published “ Medical Science Under Dictatorship” in 1949 in the New England journal of Medicine, He pointed out that the holocaust was made possible through a massive public propaganda campaign to undermine medical ethics. The chronically sick, the mentally or physically disabled were, he observed, the first victims. “It started”. Dr. Alexander wrote, “with the
Acceptance of the attitude, basic in the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived”.
Proponents of euthanasia
The voluntary Euthanasia Legalization Society was formed in 1935, but because of the bad name euthanasia had received during the war, the movement went underground, to reappear later under a variety of titles. Similarly, the Euthanasia Education Council, formed 30 years ago in the U.S., is now named Concern for Dying.
In 1989, Dr C. Everett Koop, former Surgeon General of the U.S., commented on the language of the euthanasia movement:
Like many other areas of the reform, euthanasia has undergone a change our vocabulary that is in part inspired by the political aims of some of the participants in that debate. For example, the Euthanasia Society if America founded in the 1930’s, changed its name the mid-70’s to the Society for the Right to die. The society acknowledged that the intent to avoid the controversy engendered by the term ‘euthanasia’ played a part in this decision. ‘Right to die ‘ has become a catchword in this debate, but one that is not well understood. Issues in Law and Medicine, Vol. 5, No.2, 1989.
Most pro euthanasia groups belong to the World Federation of Right to Die Society, which claims members in 18 countries, at its 1984 meeting, Helga Kuhse of Australia outlined the strategy to be used to gain public acceptance of euthanasia:
If we can get people to accept the removal of all treatment and care especially the removal of food and fluid they will see what a painful way this is to die, and then, in the patient’s best interest, they will accept the lethal injection.
for more on Euthanasia :
DECLARATION ON EUTHANASIA Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith May 5, 1980
http://www.priestsforlife.org/euthanasia/euthanasia.html
